Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978325›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Current Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in Bacterial Pathogens among Adult and Pediatric Patients in the Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kolkata, India.

Mandira Chakraborty, Sayani Sardar, Rituparna De, Malabika Biswas, Maria Teresa Mascellino, Maria Claudia Miele, Silpak Biswas, Anita Nandi Mitra

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mandira ChakrabortyDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata 700073, India.
Sayani SardarDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata 700073, India.
Rituparna DeDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata 700073, India.
Malabika BiswasDepartment of Microbiology, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata 700073, India.
Maria Teresa MascellinoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7684-3088
Maria Claudia MieleDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-2480
Silpak BiswasDepartment of Microbiology, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata 700073, India.
Anita Nandi MitraDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata 700073, India.
Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata · INSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nosocomial infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are among the main causes of morbidity and death in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. Antibiotic resistance has become a major concern for treating the patients with nosocomial infections. The aim of this study was to describe the antibiotic resistance patterns of pathogens causing infections in adult and pediatric patients in the ICUs of a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, India. A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted from January 2022 to October 2022 on a total of 139 adult and 146 pediatric patients. Depending on clinical symptoms of the patients, samples were collected and subjected to antibiotic sensitivity testing. The culture and sensitivity pattern of clinical isolates from blood, urine, sputum, endotracheal tube (ET) aspirate, and central line catheter insertion site swabs were analyzed. A total of 695 and 556 specimens were obtained from adult and pediatric ICU, respectively. Culture positivity rate among adults and pediatric patients were 37% and 40%, respectively. The most commonly isolated organisms were Gram-negative Enterobacterales and non-fermenters. Most of the bacterial isolates showed very high resistance against multiple antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceintensive care unitsmultidrug-resistant bacterianosocomial infectionspublic health

Identifiers

PMID36978325
PMCPMC10044231
OpenAlexW4322500849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read131
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.