ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Tumor-to-bone distance and radiomic features on MRI distinguish intramuscular lipomas from well-differentiated liposarcomas.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features to Distinguish Lipomas from Atypical Lipomatous Tumours in the Extremities and Back.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- End-to-end deep learning model for the diagnosis and segmentation of primary retroperitoneal neoplasm: a multicenter cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiating dedifferentiated liposarcoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Effects of Interobserver Segmentation Variability and Intensity Discretization on MRI-Based Radiomic Feature Reproducibility of Lipoma and Atypical Lipomatous Tumor.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: an updated systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for the imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop a machine learning model based on tumor-to-bone distance and radiomic features derived from preoperative MRI images to distinguish intramuscular (IM) lipomas and atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALTs/WDLSs) and compared with radiologists.
methodsThe study included patients with IM lipomas and ALTs/WDLSs diagnosed between 2010 and 2022, and with MRI scans (sequence/field strength: T1-weighted (T1W) imaging at 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla MRI). Manual segmentation of tumors based on the three-dimensional T1W images was performed by two observers to appraise the intra- and interobserver variability. After radiomic features and tumor-to-bone distance were extracted, it was used to train a machine learning model to distinguish IM lipomas and ALTs/WDLSs. Both feature selection and classification steps were performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator logistic regression. The performance of the classification model was assessed using a tenfold cross-validation strategy and subsequently evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The classification agreement of two experienced musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists was assessed using the kappa statistics. The diagnosis accuracy of each radiologist was evaluated using the final pathological results as the gold standard. Additionally, we compared the performance of the model and two radiologists in terms of the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUCs) using the Delong's test.
resultsThere were 68 tumors (38 IM lipomas and 30 ALTs/WDLSs). The AUC of the machine learning model was 0.88 [95% CI 0.72-1] (sensitivity, 91.6%; specificity, 85.7%; and accuracy, 89.0%). For Radiologist 1, the AUC was 0.94 [95% CI 0.87-1] (sensitivity, 97.4%; specificity, 90.9%; and accuracy, 95.0%), and as to Radiologist 2, the AUC was 0.91 [95% CI 0.83-0.99] (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 81.8%; and accuracy, 93.3%). The classification agreement of the radiologists was 0.89 of kappa value (95% CI 0.76-1). Although the AUC of the model was lower than of two experienced MSK radiologists, there was no statistically significant difference between the model and two radiologists (all P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe novel machine learning model based on tumor-to-bone distance and radiomic features is a noninvasive procedure that has the potential for distinguishing IM lipomas from ALTs/WDLSs. The predictive features that suggested malignancy were size, shape, depth, texture, histogram, and tumor-to-bone distance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.