Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978164›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023

Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Xu Han, Hui Li, Sha-Sha Dong, Shui-Ying Zhou, Cai-Hong Wang, Lin Guo, Jie Yang, Gang-Ling Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xu HanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Sha-Sha DongDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Shui-Ying ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Cai-Hong WangDepartment of Operating Room, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Lin GuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China.
Gang-Ling ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Baotou Cancer Hospital, No.18 Tuanjie Street, Qingshan District, Baotou, 014030, Inner Mongolia, China. zhanggl448@outlook.com.
Baogang Group (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the factors related to the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and find appropriate evaluation methods for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy

methodsA total of 143 patients with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Baotou Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The chemotherapy regimen was mainly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for 1 week, docetaxel combined with carboplatin for 3 weeks, and was replaced with epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide after evaluation of disease progression. All HER2-positive patients were treated with simultaneous targeted therapy, including trastuzumab single-target therapy and trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab double-target therapy. Combined with physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a systematic evaluation system was initially established-the "triple evaluation method." A baseline evaluation was conducted before treatment. The efficacy was evaluated by physical examination and color Doppler every cycle, and the efficacy was evaluated by physical examination, color Doppler, and MRI every two cycles.

resultsThe increase in ultrasonic blood flow after treatment could affect the efficacy of monitoring. The presence of two preoperative time-signal intensity curves is a therapeutically effective protective factor for inflow. The triple evaluation determined by physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, and MRI in determining clinical efficacy is consistent with the effectiveness of the pathological gold standard.

conclusionThe therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant therapy can be better evaluated by combining clinical physical examination, color ultrasound, and nuclear magnetic resonance evaluation. The three methods complement each other to avoid the insufficient evaluation of a single method, which is convenient for most prefecty-level hospitals. Additionally, this method is simple, feasible, and suitable for promotion.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCyclophosphamideEpirubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeCarboplatinCyclophosphamideEpirubicinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabBreast cancerColor Doppler ultrasoundMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyPhysical examinationTriple evaluation method

Identifiers

PMID36978164
PMCPMC10052864
OpenAlexW4361224502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.