Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978065›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Disclosing medical errors: how do we prepare our students?

Dirkie Swinfen, Mathys Labuschagne, Gina Joubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dirkie SwinfenClinical Simulation and Skills Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, 205 Nelson Mandela Drive, 9300, Bloemfontein, South Africa. swinfend@ufs.ac.za.
Mathys LabuschagneClinical Simulation and Skills Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, 205 Nelson Mandela Drive, 9300, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Gina JoubertDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite patient safety initiatives, medical errors remain common and devastating. Disclosing errors is not only ethical, but also promotes restoration of the doctor-patient relationship. However, studies show active avoidance of error disclosure and the need for explicit training. In the South African setting, sparse information exists in terms of undergraduate medical training in error disclosure. To address this knowledge gap, the training of error disclosure in an undergraduate medical programme was examined, against the background of the available literature. The objective was to formulate a strategy to improve error disclosure teaching and practice, with the goal of improving patient care.

methodsFirstly, the literature was reviewed regarding the training of medical error disclosure. Secondly, the undergraduate medical training in error disclosure was probed, by looking at the pertinent findings from a broader study on undergraduate communication skills training. The design of the study was descriptive and cross-sectional. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to all fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate medical students. Data were predominantly analysed quantitatively. Open-ended questions were analysed qualitatively using grounded theory coding.

resultsOut of 132 fifth-year medical students, 106 participated (response rate 80.3%), while 65 out of 120 fourth-year students participated (response rate 54.2%). Of these participants, 48 fourth-year students (73.9%) and 64 fifth-year students (60.4%) reported infrequent teaching in the disclosure of medical errors. Almost half of the fourth-year students (49.2%) considered themselves novices in error disclosure, while 53.3% of fifth-year students rated their ability as average. According to 37/63 (58.7%) fourth-year students and 51/100 (51.0%) fifth-year students, senior doctors seldom or never modelled patient-centred care in the clinical training setting. These results resonated with the findings of other studies that showed lack of patient-centredness, as well as insufficient training in error disclosure, with resultant low confidence in this skill.

conclusionThe study findings confirmed a dire need for more frequent experiential training in the disclosure of medical errors, in undergraduate medical education. Medical educators should view errors as learning opportunities to improve patient care and model error disclosure in the clinical learning environment.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMedical ErrorsTruth DisclosureBarriers to error disclosureDisclosure of medical errorsDoctor-patient communication skills trainingDuty of candourLitigationMedical errorsMedical ethicsPatient safetyRole modelling in medical education

Identifiers

PMID36978065
PMCPMC10054053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.