Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978051›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Marital status and gambling disorder: a longitudinal study based on national registry data.

André Syvertsen, Tony Leino, Ståle Pallesen, Otto R F Smith, Børge Sivertsen, Mark D Griffiths, Rune Aune Mentzoni

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

André SyvertsenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, 5020, Norway. andre.syvertsen@uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-3758
Tony LeinoDeparment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-4153
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, 5020, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-0840
Otto R F SmithDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, 5020, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-2239
Børge SivertsenDeparment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4654-9296
Mark D GriffithsInternational Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-6524
Rune Aune MentzoniDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, Bergen, 5020, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-0292
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Bergen · NONottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarital status is a robust correlate of disordered gambling, but few studies have examined the direction of this association.

methodsThe present study used a case-control design by including all adults receiving their first gambling disorder (GD) diagnosis between January 2008 to December 2018 (Norwegian Patient Registry, n = 5,121) and compared them against age and gender matched individuals with other somatic/psychiatric illnesses (Norwegian Patient Registry, n = 27,826) and a random sample from the general population (FD-Trygd database, n = 26,695). The study examined marital status before GD, getting divorced as a risk factor for future GD, and becoming married as a protective factor of future GD.

resultsThe findings indicated an 8-9 percentage points higher prevalence of unmarried people and about a 5 percentage points higher prevalence of separation/divorce among those that subsequently experienced GD compared to controls. Logistic regressions showed that transition through divorce was associated with higher odds of future GD compared to illness controls (odds ratio [OR] = 2.45, 95% CI [2.06, 2.92]) and the general population (OR = 2.41 [2.02, 2.87]). Logistic regressions also showed that transition through marriage was associated with lower odds of future GD compared to illness controls (OR = 0.62, CI [0.55, 0.70]) and the general population (OR = 0.57, CI [0.50, 0.64]).

conclusionsSocial bonds have previously been shown to impact physical and mental health, and the findings of the study emphasize the importance of considering social network history and previous relationship dissolution among individuals with GD.

Indexed as

GamblingAdultDivorceHumansLongitudinal StudiesMarital StatusMarriageRoutinely Collected Health DataDivorceGambling disorderMarriageRegistry dataRelationship statusRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36978051
PMCPMC10045908
OpenAlexW4361218744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read52
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.