Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36978032›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

Deprescribing psychotropic medicines for behaviours that challenge in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.

Danielle Adams, Richard P Hastings, Ian Maidment, Chetan Shah, Peter E Langdon

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle AdamsCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 8UW, UK. danielle.adams@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7705-9540
Richard P HastingsCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 8UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-8270
Ian MaidmentSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4152-9704
Chetan ShahPharmacy Department, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hertfordshire, WD7 9FB, UK.
Peter E LangdonCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 8UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-1825
University of Warwick · GBAston University · GBHertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClear evidence of overprescribing of psychotropic medicines to manage behaviours that challenges in people with intellectual disabilities has led to national programmes within the U.K. such as NHS England's STOMP to address this. The focus of the intervention in our review was deprescribing of psychotropic medicines in children and adults with intellectual disabilities. Mental health symptomatology and quality of life were main outcomes.

methodsWe reviewed the evidence using databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL and Open Grey with an initial cut-off date of 22nd August 2020 and an update on 14th March 2022. The first reviewer (DA) extracted data using a bespoke form and appraised study quality using CASP and Murad tools. The second reviewer (CS) independently assessed a random 20% of papers.

resultsDatabase searching identified 8675 records with 54 studies included in the final analysis. The narrative synthesis suggests that psychotropic medicines can sometimes be deprescribed. Positive and negative consequences were reported. Positive effects on behaviour, mental and physical health were associated with an interdisciplinary model.

conclusionsThis is the first systematic review of the effects of deprescribing psychotropic medicines in people with intellectual disabilities which is not limited to antipsychotics. Main risks of bias were underpowered studies, poor recruitment processes, not accounting for other concurrent interventions and short follow up periods. Further research is needed to understand how to address the negative effects of deprescribing interventions.

trial registrationThe protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019158079).

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsIntellectual DisabilityAdultChildHumansMental HealthPsychotropic DrugsQuality of LifePsychotropic DrugsBehaviours that challengesDeprescribingIntellectual disabilitiesPsychotropic medication

Identifiers

PMID36978032
PMCPMC10044393
OpenAlexW4361222790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read23
measurements read348
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.