ArticleBMC geriatrics2023
Determining the factors influencing the selection of post-acute care models by patients and their families: a qualitative content analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring factors affecting the acceptance of fall detection technology among older adults and their families: a content analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Strategic threat health response in Australia capital cities: Predicting the optimum locations for field hospitals through geospatial analysis.Public health challenges · 2024Article
- Impact of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice on Functional Improvements Among Post-Acute Stroke Survivors: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Analysis and Report of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Evaluation Activity in Patients Admitted to Acute Care Setting: An Observational Retrospective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study conducted in-depth interviews to explore the factors that influence the choice of a post-acute care (PAC) model (inpatient rehabilitation hospital, skilled nursing facility, home health, and outpatient rehabilitation) among stroke patients and their families.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews of 21 stroke patients and their families at four hospitals in Taiwan. Content analysis was used in this qualitative study.
resultsResults revealed five main factors that influence respondents' choice of PAC: (1) medical professionals' suggestions, (2) health care accessibility, (3) continuity and coordination of care, (4) willingness and prior experience of patients and their relatives and friends, and (5) economic factors.
conclusionsThis study identifies five main factors that affect the choice of PAC models among stroke patients and their families. We suggest that policymakers establish comprehensive health care resources based on the needs of patients and families. Health care providers shall provide professional recommendations and adequate information to support decision-making, which aligns with the preferences and values of patients and their families. From this research, we hope to improve the accessibility of PAC services in order to enhance the quality of care for stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.