Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36977973›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2023

Phase 1 study of oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) amcenestrant (SAR439859), in Japanese women with ER-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (AMEERA-2).

Kenji Tamura, Toru Mukohara, Kan Yonemori, Yumiko Kawabata, Xavier Nicolas, Tomoyuki Tanaka, Hiroji Iwata

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03816839 (A Phase 1 Study for the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of SAR439859, Administered Orally as Monotherapy in Japanese Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive And Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03816839 phase1terminatednot on this map

A Phase 1 Study for the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of SAR439859, Administered Orally as Monotherapy in Japanese Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive And Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer (AMEERA-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2019 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAmcenestrant (SAR439859)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Targeting Estrogen Receptor for Breast Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenji TamuraShimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan.
Toru MukoharaNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kan YonemoriNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yumiko KawabataSanofi, Tokyo, Japan.
Xavier NicolasSanofi, Montpellier, France.
Tomoyuki TanakaSanofi, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroji IwataAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. hiwata@aichi-cc.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0242-4718
Sanofi (Japan) · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPSanofi (France) · FRShimane University Hospital · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis AMEERA-2 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader amcenestrant as a monotherapy with dose escalation in Japanese postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer.

methodsIn this open-label, nonrandomized, phase I study, patients received amcenestrant 400 mg once daily (QD) (n = 7) and 300 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 3). The incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), recommended dose, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.

resultsNo DLTs were observed and MTD was not reached in the 400 mg QD group. One DLT (grade 3 maculopapular rash) was reported in a patient treated with 300 mg BID. After repeated oral administration of either dosing regimen, steady state reached before day 8, without accumulation. Four out of 5 response-evaluable patients from 400 mg QD group achieved clinical benefit and showed tumor shrinkage. No clinical benefit was reported in the 300 mg BID group. Overall, most patients (8/10) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders most commonly reported (4/10 patients). No ≥ grade 3 TRAE in 400 mg QD group and 1 grade 3 TRAE in 300 mg BID group were reported.

conclusionsAmcenestrant 400 mg QD has a favorable safety profile and has been selected as the recommended Phase II dose for monotherapy for evaluating the safety and efficacy of amcenestrant in a larger, global, randomized clinical trial of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

trial registrationClinical trial registration NCT03816839.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogen AntagonistsAdministration, OralEast Asian PeopleFemaleGenes, erbB-2HumansMaximum Tolerated DoseReceptors, EstrogenSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsEstrogen AntagonistsReceptors, EstrogenSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsAdvanced breast cancerAmcenestrantOral SERDPharmacokineticsPredictive markers

Identifiers

PMID36977973
PMCPMC10119216
OpenAlexW4361284438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.