ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023
Auditory scene context facilitates visual recognition of objects in consistent visual scenes.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual object recognition is facilitated by contextually consistent scenes in which the object is embedded. Scene gist representations extracted from the scenery backgrounds yield this scene consistency effect. Here we examined whether the scene consistency effect is specific to the visual domain or if it is crossmodal. Through four experiments, the accuracy of the naming of briefly presented visual objects was assessed. In each trial, a 4-s sound clip was presented and a visual scene containing the target object was briefly shown at the end of the sound clip. In a consistent sound condition, an environmental sound associated with the scene in which the target object typically appears was presented (e.g., forest noise for a bear target object). In an inconsistent sound condition, a sound clip contextually inconsistent with the target object was presented (e.g., city noise for a bear). In a control sound condition, a nonsensical sound (sawtooth wave) was presented. When target objects were embedded in contextually consistent visual scenes (Experiment 1: a bear in a forest background), consistent sounds increased object-naming accuracy. In contrast, sound conditions did not show a significant effect when target objects were embedded in contextually inconsistent visual scenes (Experiment 2: a bear in a pedestrian crossing background) or in a blank background (Experiments 3 and 4). These results suggested that auditory scene context has weak or no direct influence on visual object recognition. It seems likely that consistent auditory scenes indirectly facilitate visual object recognition by promoting visual scene processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36977906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.