ArticleThoracic cancer2023
Efficacy of different platforms in detecting EGFR mutations using cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA from non-small-cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA as a prognostic and disease-activity biomarker in leptomeningeal metastases: systematic review, meta-analysis, and implications for CSF-guided care.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Review
- Advances in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of leptomeningeal metastases (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Demonstrating the clinical utility of genomic profiling using cerebrospinal fluid to inform management of central nervous system tumors - a meta analysis of the literature.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Clinical characteristics and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid biochemical, tumor markers and cytologic indices in 209 patients with meningeal carcinomatosis: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in peripheral blood of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid tumor DNA in lung cancer patients with suspected leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical application of liquid biopsy genomic profiling in NSCLC: Asian perspectives.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Review
- Efficacy of different platforms in detecting EGFR mutations using cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA from non-small-cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) obtained through liquid biopsy is useful for the molecular analysis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few studies have directly compared analysis platforms in terms of their diagnostic performance in analyzing ctDNA obtained from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM).
methodsWe prospectively analyzed patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC who were subjected to CSF analysis for suspected LM. To detect EGFR mutations, CSF ctDNA was analyzed using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). CSF samples from osimertinib-refractory patients with LM were also subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS).
resultsSignificantly higher rates of valid results (95.1% vs. 78%, respectively, p = 0.04) and EGFR common mutation detection (94.3% vs. 77.1%, respectively, p = 0.047) were obtained through ddPCR than through the cobas EGFR Mutation Test. The sensitivities of ddPCR and cobas were 94.3% and 75.6%, respectively. The concordance rate for EGFR mutation detection through ddPCR and the cobas EGFR Mutation Test was 75.6% and that for EGFR mutation detection in CSF and plasma ctDNA was 28.1%. In osimertinib-resistant CSF samples, all original EGFR mutations were detected through NGS. MET amplification and CCDC6-RET fusion were demonstrated in one patient each (9.1%).
conclusionsThe cobas EGFR Mutation Test, ddPCR, and NGS appear to be feasible methods for analyzing CSF ctDNA in patients with NSCLC and LM. In addition, NGS may provide comprehensive information regarding the mechanisms underlying osimertinib resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.