Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36977539›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Fundamental nursing care focusing on older people's needs and continuity of long-term care: a scoping review protocol.

Ole Martin Nordaunet, Edith Roth Gjevjon, Cecilia Olsson, Hanne Aagaard, Gunilla Borglin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ole Martin NordaunetInstitute of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden ole.martin.nordaunet@ldh.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6061-0033
Edith Roth GjevjonBachelor of Education in Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-522X
Cecilia OlssonInstitute of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0944-5650
Hanne AagaardLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7810-9298
Gunilla BorglinBachelor of Education in Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7934-6949
Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NOKarlstad University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnowledge about long-term care services ability, regardless of if the service is home-based or facility-based, to provide an optimal and comprehensive fundamental nursing care (understood as focusing on physical, relational and psychosocial needs) consistently over time is sparse. Research into nursing indicates the presence of a discontinuous and fragmented healthcare service, and that fundamental nursing care such as mobilisation, nutrition and hygiene among older people (65 years and above) seems to be, regardless of reasons, systematically rationed by nursing staff. Thus, our scoping review aims to explore the published scientific literature on fundamental nursing care and continuity of care targeting older people's needs while also describing identified nursing interventions with the same foci in a long-term care context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The upcoming scoping review will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping studies. Search strategies will be developed and adjusted to each database, for example, PubMed, CINAHL and PsychINFO. Searches will be limited to the years 2002-2023. Studies focusing our aim, regardless of study design, will be eligible for inclusion. Included studies will be quality assessed and data will be charted using an extraction form. Textual data will be presented through a thematic analysis and numerical data by a descriptive numerical analysis. This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The upcoming scoping review will take into consideration ethical reporting in primary research as part of the quality assessment. The findings will be submitted to an open-access peer-reviewed journal. Under the Norwegian Act on Medical and Health-related Research, this study does not need ethical clearance by a regional ethical review authority as it will not generate any primary data or obtain sensitive data or biological samples.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareNursing CareAgedHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicagedprimary carequality in health carestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID36977539
PMCPMC10069605
OpenAlexW4361212544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.