ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2023
The value of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in the diagnosis of lung cancer and its correlation with clinical characteristics.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers Suitable for Early Detection of Intrathoracic Cancers in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Value of circulating tumor cell assisting low-dose computed tomography in screening pulmonary nodules based on existing liquid biopsy techniques: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Predictive value of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in postoperative progressive disease of non-small cell lung cancer patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Regulating chemoresistance and cancer stemness: the CDH17-YAP pathway in distinct cellular states of lung cancer CTC clusters.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in differentiating between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- The value of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in the diagnosis of lung cancer and its correlation with clinical characteristics.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this research is to investigate the feasibility of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) as a biomarker for the diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules and the correlation between clinicopathological factors and FR+CTC levels.
methodsPatients initially diagnosed with one or more pulmonary nodules from a computed tomography scan were prospectively included. Three milliliters of peripheral blood was collected from each participant for FR+CTC analysis prior to surgery. Clinical and pathological parameters and FR+CTC levels were compared between patients with lung cancer and benign diseases.
resultsSix hundred fifty-three patients had lung cancer and the other 124 had benign lung diseases based on pathological examinations of the resected specimens. The median FR+CTC value of the lung cancer group was 12.0 (95% CI 9.6-16.2) FU/3 mL and that of the benign group was 7.2 (95% CI 5.78-11.2) FU/3 mL. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In a receiver operating characteristic analysis to distinguish the two groups, the area under curve of FR+CTC was 0.7457 (95% CI 0.6893-0.8021; P < 0.0001) using a cutoff of 8.65 FU/3 mL. The sensitivity was 86.37%, and the specificity was 74.19%. Combined with conventional serum tumor biomarkers, the area under curve was 0.922 (0.499-0.963). The sensitivity was 92.20%, and the specificity was 83.05%. FR+CTC levels were related to tumor staging (P4 < 0.001), the degree of tumor invasion both in single (P = 0.011) and multiple lesions (P = 0.022), pathological subtypes (P = 0.013), and maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.014).
conclusionsFR+CTC is an effective and reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Further, FR+CTC level is correlated with tumor staging, degree of invasion, pathological subtypes, and tumor size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.