Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36977406›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2023

Analysis of the Measurement Properties of the Female Sexual Function Index 6-item Version (FSFI-6) in a Postpartum Brazilian Population.

Julianna de Azevedo Guendler, Melania Maria Amorim, Maria Eduarda Melo Flamini, Alexandre Delgado, Andrea Lemos, Leila Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQoL-F): Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version in postpartum women.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julianna de Azevedo GuendlerInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-2599
Melania Maria AmorimInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-2514
Maria Eduarda Melo FlaminiHospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-7398
Alexandre DelgadoInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-4196
Andrea LemosUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-0512
Leila KatzInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-7917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Female Sexual Function Index 6-item Version (FSFI-6) for postpartum women.

methodsTherefore, questionnaires were applied to 100 sexually active women in the postpartum period. The Cronbach α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by Kappa for each item of the questionnaire and by the Wilcoxon parametric test, comparing the total scores of each evaluation. For the assessment of criterion validity, the FSFI was used as the gold standard and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). It was found that the internal consistency of the FSFI-6 questionnaire was considerably high (0.839).

resultsThe test-retest reliability results were satisfactory. It can also be stated that the FSFI-6 questionnaire presented excellent discriminant validity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.926). Women may be considered as having sexual dysfunction if the overall FSFI-6 score is < 21, with 85.5% sensitivity, 82.2% specificity, positive likelihood ratio of 4.81 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.18.

conclusionWe conclude that the Brazilian Portuguese version of FSFI-6 is valid for use in postpartum women.

Indexed as

Sexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalBrazilFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36977406
PMCPMC10078855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.