Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36977209›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023

Isolation, identification, molecular typing, and drug resistance of Escherichia coli from infected cattle and sheep in Xinjiang, China.

Xiaoxiao Gu, Xue Ma, Qin Wu, Qiaoxiaoci Tao, Yingjin Chai, Xia Zhou, Mengli Han, Jie Li, Xin Huang, Tongzhong Wu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Multidrug-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of ofloxacin resistance inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoxiao GuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Xue MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Qin WuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Qiaoxiaoci TaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Yingjin ChaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Xia ZhouCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7461-5276
Mengli HanState Key Laboratory for Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, China.
Jie LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Xin HuangState Key Laboratory for Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, China.
Tongzhong WuState Key Laboratory for Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, China.
Xingxing ZhangState Key Laboratory for Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, China.
Fagang ZhongState Key Laboratory for Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, China.
Yiheng CaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Liyuan ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Shihezi University · CNXinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscherichia coli infections are common in Xinjiang, a major region of cattle and sheep breeding in China. Therefore, strategies are required to control E. coli. The aim of this study was to investigate the phylogenetic groups, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance characteristics of E. coli isolates.

methodsIn this study, 116 tissue samples were collected from the organs of cattle and sheep that were suspected of having E. coli infections between 2015 and 2019. Bacteria in the samples were identified using a biochemical identification system and amplification of 16S rRNA, and the phylogenetic groupings of E. coli isolates were determined by multiplex polymerase chain reactions. In addition, PCR detection and analysis of virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes, and drug-resistant phenotypes of E. coli isolates were performed.

resultsA total of 116 pathogenic E. coli strains belonging to seven phylogenetic groups were isolated, with the majority of isolates in groups A and B1. Among the virulence genes, curli-encoding crl had the highest detection rate of 97.4%, followed by hemolysin-encoding hlyE with the detection rate of 94.82%. Antimicrobial susceptibility test results indicated that the isolates had the highest rates of resistance against streptomycin (81.9%).

conclusionThese characteristics complicate the prevention and treatment of E. coli-related diseases in Xinjiang.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesEscherichia coli InfectionsSheep DiseasesAnimalsCattleChinaDrug ResistanceEscherichia coliMolecular TypingMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibiotic resistancecattleEscherichia coli infectionsmultiplex polymerase chain reactionphylogenysheepvirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID36977209
PMCPMC10188099
OpenAlexW4361210532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.