Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36977195›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2023

KRAS mutations and endometriosis burden of disease.

Natasha L Orr, Arianne Albert, Yang Doris Liu, Amy Lum, JooYoon Hong, Catalina L Ionescu, Janine Senz, Tayyebeh M Nazeran, Anna F Lee, Heather Noga and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06289257 (Analysis of Vitamin D and VDR Expression in Women With Advanced Endometriosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06289257 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of Vitamin D and VDR Expression in Women With Advanced Endometriosis: A Case-Control Study in Thailand

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKhon Kaen UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled108ConditionsEndometriosis, Vitamin D Deficiency/Insufficiency, Vitamin D StatusArmsVitamin D level, Vitamin D receptor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Nociplastic Pain in Endometriosis: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Natasha L OrrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7413-9369
Arianne AlbertWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Yang Doris LiuBC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Amy LumDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
JooYoon HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Catalina L IonescuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Janine SenzDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tayyebeh M NazeranDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Anna F LeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Heather NogaBC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Kate LawrensonWomen's Cancer Research Program at Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Catherine AllaireDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Christina WilliamsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Mohamed A BedaiwyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Michael S Anglesio *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-5003
Paul J Yong *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAWomen's Health Research Institute · CAB.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre · CACedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

CIHR MOP-142273CIHR PJT-156084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical phenotype of somatic mutations in endometriosis is unknown. The objective was to determine whether somatic KRAS mutations were associated with greater disease burden in endometriosis (i.e. more severe subtypes and higher stage). This prospective longitudinal cohort study included 122 subjects undergoing endometriosis surgery at a tertiary referral center between 2013 and 2017, with 5-9 years of follow-up. Somatic activating KRAS codon 12 mutations were detected in endometriosis lesions using droplet digital PCR. KRAS mutation status for each subject was coded as present (KRAS mutation in at least one endometriosis sample in a subject) or absent. Standardized clinical phenotyping for each subject was carried out via linkage to a prospective registry. Primary outcome was anatomic disease burden, based on distribution of subtypes (deep infiltrating endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and superficial peritoneal endometriosis) and surgical staging (Stages I-IV). Secondary outcomes were markers of surgical difficulty, demographics, pain scores, and risk of re-operation. KRAS mutation presence was higher in subjects with deep infiltrating endometriosis or endometrioma lesions only (57.9%; 11/19) and subjects with mixed subtypes (60.6%; 40/66), compared with those with superficial endometriosis only (35.1%; 13/37) (p = 0.04). KRAS mutation was present in 27.6% (8/29) of Stage I cases, in comparison to 65.0% (13/20) of Stage II, 63.0% (17/27) of Stage III, and 58.1% (25/43) of Stage IV cases (p = 0.02). KRAS mutation was also associated with greater surgical difficulty (ureterolysis) (relative risk [RR] = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02-2.11) and non-Caucasian ethnicity (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.89). Pain severities did not differ based on KRAS mutation status, at either baseline or follow-up. Re-operation rates were low overall, occurring in 17.2% with KRAS mutation compared with 10.3% without (RR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.66-4.21). In conclusion, KRAS mutations were associated with greater anatomic severity of endometriosis, resulting in increased surgical difficulty. Somatic cancer-driver mutations may inform a future molecular classification of endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisNeoplasmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)classificationendometriomaendometriosisethnicityfertilitygeneKRASpainsomatic mutationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID36977195
PMCPMC10240146
OpenAlexW4361225187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.