Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36977159›Full record

ReviewTropical medicine and infectious disease2023

Global Seropositivity of Swine Leptospirosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hosaneide Gomes de Araújo, Clécio Henrique Limeira, Vitória Viviane Ferreira de Aquino, Vinícius Longo Ribeiro Vilela, Clebert José Alves, Severino Silvano Dos Santos Higino, Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista Santos, Sérgio Santos de Azevedo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A systematic review and meta-analysis ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Co-Infection byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hosaneide Gomes de AraújoAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.
Clécio Henrique LimeiraAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.
Vitória Viviane Ferreira de AquinoAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.
Vinícius Longo Ribeiro VilelaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Institute of Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa 58814-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9891-7842
Clebert José AlvesAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.
Severino Silvano Dos Santos HiginoAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.
Carolina de Sousa Américo Batista SantosAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.
Sérgio Santos de AzevedoAcademic Unit of Veterinary Medicine (UAMV), Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos 58708-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-7348

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 302222/2016-2 and 423836/2018-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a major threat to public health worldwide; however, there is no study focused on global seropositivity in pigs. In this study, we grouped publications and performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to gather data related to swine leptospirosis seropositivity published globally. The search method initially used returned a total of 1183 results, of which 20 met all predefined criteria and were therefore included in this review. Meta-analysis with general data was performed and a combined seropositivity of 21.95% was found. Seropositivity was 36.40% in South America, 34.05% in North America, 22.18% in Africa, 17.40% in Oceania, 13.30% in Europe and 13.36% in Asia. The results suggest that there is high seropositivity for leptospirosis in pigs worldwide. Information compiled from this research is relevant to understanding the spread of leptospirosis globally. It is expected that these indicators will contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiology of the disease with a focus on its control and, consequently, on the reduction of cases in the human and animal population.

Indexed as

controlepidemiologyLeptospira spp.one healthpigserology

Identifiers

PMID36977159
PMCPMC10059827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.