ReviewToxins2023
Challenges and Opportunities in Clinical Diagnostic Routine of Envenomation Using Blood Plasma Proteomics.
Review in Toxins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computational immunology in venom research: a systematic review of epitope prediction and validation approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Translational medicine protocol for proteomics clinical research on snakebite envenoming: contributions for develop studies in mechanisms and new biomarkers.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Bee Venom Melittin Modulates In Vivo Water Permeability of Red Blood Cells: Microscopic andMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- What Can Proteomics Tell us About COVID-19 Infections? Mass Spectrometry as a Tool to Find New Proteins as Biomarkers.Current protein & peptide science · 2025Review
- Scorpions are taking over: the silent and escalating public health crisis in Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Thromboinflammatory complications ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of human envenoming by terrestrial venomous animals: Routine, advances, and perspectives.Toxicon: X · 2024Article
- Clinical complications in envenoming byFrontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Unveiling the Pain Relief Potential: Harnessing Analgesic Peptides from Animal Venoms.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Crosstalk of Inflammation and Coagulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Specific and sensitive tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of accidents by venomous animals are urgently needed. Several diagnostic and monitoring assays have been developed; however, they have not yet reached the clinic. This has resulted in late diagnoses, which represents one of the main causes of progression from mild to severe disease. Human blood is a protein-rich biological fluid that is routinely collected in hospital settings for diagnostic purposes, which can translate research progress from the laboratory to the clinic. Although it is a limited view, blood plasma proteins provide information about the clinical picture of envenomation. Proteome disturbances in response to envenomation by venomous animals have been identified, allowing mass spectrometry (MS)-based plasma proteomics to emerge as a tool in a range of clinical diagnostics and disease management that can be applied to cases of venomous animal envenomation. Here, we provide a review of the state of the art on routine laboratory diagnoses of envenomation by snakes, scorpions, bees, and spiders, as well as a review of the diagnostic methods and the challenges encountered. We present the state of the art on clinical proteomics as the standardization of procedures to be performed within and between research laboratories, favoring a more excellent peptide coverage of candidate proteins for biomarkers. Therefore, the selection of a sample type and method of preparation should be very specific and based on the discovery of biomarkers in specific approaches. However, the sample collection protocol (e.g., collection tube type) and the processing procedure of the sample (e.g., clotting temperature, time allowed for clotting, and anticoagulant used) are equally important to eliminate any bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.