Serum Iodine and Bromine in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients-An Observational Study in a Cohort of Portuguese Patients.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Iodine and Bromine Analysis in Human Urine and Serum by ICP-MS, Tailored for High-Throughput Routine Analysis in Population-Based Studies.Analytica (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
2. Assessment and management of magnesium and trace element status in children with CKD stages 2-5, on dialysis and post-transplantation: Clinical practice points from the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as