ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2023
Factors Affecting Participation in Cervical Screening by Female Nurses in Public Health Institutions in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province.
Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice towards cervical cancer screening in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Factors that contribute to women's reluctance to undergo cervical cancer screening in clinics of Limpopo Province, South Africa.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In South Africa, the prevalence and death rates as a result of cervical cancer remains high, creating social and economic instability. The main objective of this study was to determine factors affecting participation in cervical screening by female nurses in public health institutions in Vhembe district, Limpopo Province. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential in cervical cancer screening as the prevalence of the disease decreases. The study was carried out at public health institutions in Vhembe district, Limpopo Province. A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design was used in this study. Structured self-reported questionnaires were used in the collection of data. Descriptive statistics were used when analysing data to identify statistically significant differences in variables using SPSS version 26, and the findings were presented in percentages to generate evidence for the study. According to the study findings, (218, 83%) female nurses had been screened for cervical cancer, while the minority (46, 17%) had not been screened. The reasons cited were that they thought they were healthy (82, 31%), (79, 30%) felt embarrassed, and (15%) feared positive results. The majority (190) of them had last been screened more than three years before, with only a few (27, 10%) screened within the previous three years. A hundred and forty-two (53.8%) displayed negative attitudes and practices towards screening if it is paid for, and a hundred and eighteen (44.6%) perceived themselves as not vulnerable to acquiring cervical carcinoma. Furthermore,(128, 48.5%) strongly disagreed and 17(6.4%) were undecided about being screened by a male practitioner. The study concluded that negative attitudes, poor perception, and embarrassment are factors leading to low uptake by female nurses. Therefore, this study recommends that the Department of Health should build the capacity of nursing staff on matters of national significance to achieve sustainable goals and be a healthy nation. Nurses should be at the forefront of departmental programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.