Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976626›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

General Practitioner Use of e-Consultation to Consult Hospital Specialists: Interview Study to Obtain Physician's Perceptions About Digital Interprofessional Communication.

Ken Peeters, Esther Giroldi, Lotte Veldhuizen, Kahin Abdelaziz, Dennis Muris, Jochen Cals

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ken PeetersDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4966-8936
Esther GiroldiDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3254-4849
Lotte VeldhuizenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4580-9420
Kahin AbdelazizDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-0245
Dennis MurisDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-0182
Jochen CalsDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9550-5674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, tasks have shifted from specialized hospital care to primary care, leading to both advantages and challenges for general practitioners (GPs). A frequently mentioned tool to face these challenges is e-consultation, a form of asynchronous digital interprofessional communication between GPs and hospital specialists.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to gain insight into GPs' and hospital specialists' views and experiences of e-consultation.

methodsWe interviewed 47% (15/32) GPs and 53% (17/32) hospital specialists and performed a thematic analysis.

resultsWe found that both GPs and hospital specialists experience a positive effect on the quality of care and collaboration between GPs and hospital specialists. Positive effects were reported on the accessibility of care, efficiency of care, and relationship between the GP and the patient. Furthermore, communication between GP and hospital specialist became more efficient, and e-consultation offered educational value for the GP. Certain improvements are needed to further optimize e-consultation, regarding applicability, communication, and training purposes.

conclusionsIn the future, clinicians and policy makers can use the insights gained from this study to further optimize and implement e-consultation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

General PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationHumansQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationSpecializatione-consulte-consultationelectronic consultation

Identifiers

PMID36976626
PMCPMC10131626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.