Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976612›Full record

ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2023

Proceedings from the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference: Research Priorities for Interventions to Address Social Risks and Needs Identified in Emergency Department Patients.

Liliya Kraynov, Aaron Quarles, Andrew Kerrigan, Katherine Dickerson Mayes, Sally Mahmoud-Werthmann, Callan E Fockele, Herbert C Duber, Kelly M Doran, Michelle P Lin, Richelle J Cooper and 1 more

Full text readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Value of Medical Toxicologists.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Liliya KraynovValleywise Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona.
Aaron QuarlesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrew KerriganUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Katherine Dickerson MayesHarvard Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sally Mahmoud-WerthmannStanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford, California.
Callan E FockeleUniversity of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Herbert C DuberUniversity of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Kelly M DoranNYU School of Medicine, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Population Health, New York, New York.
Michelle P LinIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York.
Richelle J CooperDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles.
Nancy Ewen WangStanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency departments (ED) function as a health and social safety net, regularly taking care of patients with high social risk and need. Few studies have examined ED-based interventions for social risk and need.

methodsFocusing on ED-based interventions, we identified initial research gaps and priorities in the ED using a literature review, topic expert feedback, and consensus-building. Research gaps and priorities were further refined based on moderated, scripted discussions and survey feedback during the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference. Using these methods, we derived six priorities based on three identified gaps in ED-based social risks and needs interventions: 1) assessment of ED-based interventions; 2) intervention implementation in the ED environment; and 3) intercommunication between patients, EDs, and medical and social systems.

resultsUsing these methods, we derived six priorities based on three identified gaps in ED-based social risks and needs interventions: 1) assessment of ED-based interventions, 2) intervention implementation in the ED environment, and 3) intercommunication between patients, EDs, and medical and social systems. Assessing intervention effectiveness through patient-centered outcome and risk reduction measures should be high priorities in the future. Also noted was the need to study methods of integrating interventions into the ED environment and to increase collaboration between EDs and their larger health systems, community partners, social services, and local government.

conclusionThe identified research gaps and priorities offer guidance for future work to establish effective interventions and build relationships with community health and social systems to address social risks and needs, thereby improving the health of our patients.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalEvidence GapsHumansPublic HealthResearch

Identifiers

PMID36976612
PMCPMC10047718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.