Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976602›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2023

Emergency Physician Observations and Attitudes on Law Enforcement Activities in the Emergency Department.

Utsha G Khatri, Elinore J Kaufman, Emily F Seeburger, Rucha Alur, Lynne D Richardson, Eugenia C South, Sara F Jacoby

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Best practice guidelines for evaluating patients in custody in the emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Utsha G KhatriIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York.
Elinore J KaufmanUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Emily F SeeburgerPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rucha AlurUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lynne D RichardsonIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York, New York.
Eugenia C SouthPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Urban Health Lab, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sara F JacobyUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Department of Family and Community Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaw enforcement officers (LEO) interact with patients and clinicians in the emergency department (ED) for many reasons. There is no current consensus on what should comprise, or how to best enact, guidelines that ideally balance LEO activities in the service of public safety with patient health, autonomy, and privacy. The purpose of this study was to explore how a national sample of emergency physicians (EP) perceives activities of LEOs during the delivery of emergency medical care.

methodsMembers of the Emergency Medicine Practice Research Network (EMPRN) were recruited via an email-delivered, anonymous survey that elicited experiences, perceptions, and knowledge of policies that guide interactions with LEOs in the ED. The survey included multiple-choice items, which we analyzed descriptively, and open-ended questions, which we analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsOf 765 EPs in the EMPRN, 141 (18.4%) completed the survey. Respondents represented diverse locations and years in practice. A total of 113 (82%) respondents were White, and 114 (81%) were male. Over a third reported LEO presence in the ED on a daily basis. A majority (62%) perceived LEO presence as helpful for clinicians and clinical practice. When asked about the factors deemed highly important in allowing LEOs to access patients during care, 75% reported patients' potential as a threat to public safety. A small minority of respondents (12%) considered the patients' consent or preference to interact with LEOs. While 86% of EPs felt that information-gathering by LEO was appropriate in the ED setting, only 13% were aware of policy to guide these decisions. Perceived barriers to implementation of policy in this area included: issues of enforcement; leadership; education; operational challenges; and potential negative consequences.

conclusionFuture research is warranted to explore how policies and practices that guide intersections between emergency medical care and law enforcement impact patients, clinicians, and the communities that health systems serve.

Indexed as

Law EnforcementPhysiciansEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePoliceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36976602
PMCPMC10047729
OpenAlexW4327815360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read45
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.