ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2023
Lumbar puncture training with healthcare simulation improves self-confidence and practical skills of French medical residents in geriatrics.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual reality training on lumbar puncture quality (VIRTUAL): a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- User Experience Comparison of a Traditional Mannequin-Based and an Augmented Reality Lumbar Puncture Simulator in Geriatric Medicine Training: Questionnaire Study.JMIR XR and spatial computing · 2026Article
- Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial space access: a scoping review of educational approaches to lumbar puncture, epidural anaesthesia, and spinal anaesthesia.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Simulator-Based Training Sustainably Improves Confidence, Theoretical Knowledge, and Success Rates in Lumbar Puncture Among Medical Students: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the skill level and self-confidence of medical residents in geriatrics with regard to conducting the lumbar puncture (LP) procedure and to study the potential benefits of training with simulation and virtual reality.
methodsFirst, a questionnaire survey was conducted among all French residents in geriatrics in the Paris area to assess their knowledge and self-confidence regarding the practice of LP in older adults. Second, we set up a simulation LP training session combined with virtual reality (3D video) training for selected respondents of the first survey. Third, we performed post-simulation survey for the attendees of the simulation training. Finally, a follow-up survey was conducted to examine the change in self-confidence and the success rate in clinical practice.
resultsFifty-five residents responded to the survey (response rate = 36.4%). The importance of mastering LP was fully recognized by the residents in geriatrics (95.3%), so most of them (94.5%) advocated for the need for additional practical training. Fourteen residents took part in the training (average rating = 4.7 on a 5-point scale). Simulation was regarded by 83% of the respondents as the most useful tool for their practice. We observed a significant pre/post-training mean improvement in self-estimated success of 20.6% (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank W = - 36, p = 0.008). The post-training success rate of the residents in real-life clinical practice was good (85.8%).
conclusionResidents were aware of the importance of mastering LP and requested additional training. Simulation may represent a major driver to improve their self-confidence and practical skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36976436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.