ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2023
A compact review of progress and prospects of deep learning in drug discovery.
Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nanomedicine: From Drug Formulation and Nanocarrier Design to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of neural network-based approaches for drug-target interaction prediction.Molecular diversity · 2026Review
- Designing novel FAK inhibitors targeting gastric cancer: a combined approach using machine learning, docking analysis, molecular dynamics simulations, and experimental validation.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing drug discovery.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Digital intelligence technology: new quality productivity for precision traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Improved Prediction of Ligand-Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug discovery processes, such as new drug development, drug synergy, and drug repurposing, consume significant yearly resources. Computer-aided drug discovery can effectively improve the efficiency of drug discovery. Traditional computer methods such as virtual screening and molecular docking have achieved many gratifying results in drug development. However, with the rapid growth of computer science, data structures have changed considerably; with more extensive and dimensional data and more significant amounts of data, traditional computer methods can no longer be applied well. Deep learning methods are based on deep neural network structures that can handle high-dimensional data very well, so they are used in current drug development.
resultsThis review summarized the applications of deep learning methods in drug discovery, such as drug target discovery, drug de novo design, drug recommendation, drug synergy, and drug response prediction. While applying deep learning methods to drug discovery suffers from a lack of data, transfer learning is an excellent solution to this problem. Furthermore, deep learning methods can extract deeper features and have higher predictive power than other machine learning methods. Deep learning methods have great potential in drug discovery and are expected to facilitate drug discovery development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36976427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.