Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976418›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2023

Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring throughout brain compliance guiding a ventriculoperitoneal shunt replacement in hydrocephalus-case report.

Nelci Zanon, Victor Hugo da Costa Benalia, Thiago Hoesker, Cintya Yukie Hayashi, Gustavo Frigieri, Giselle Coelho

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in management of slit ventricle syndrome-case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nelci ZanonDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. nelcizanon@terra.com.br.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-7272
Victor Hugo da Costa BenaliaCentro de Neurocirurgia Pediátrica - CENEPE, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4687-8308
Thiago HoeskerCentro de Neurocirurgia Pediátrica - CENEPE, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-1743
Cintya Yukie HayashiScientific Department, Braincare Desenvolvimento e Inovação Tecnológica S.A., São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0250-8858
Gustavo FrigieriScientific Department, Braincare Desenvolvimento e Inovação Tecnológica S.A., São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-468X
Giselle CoelhoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-0356
Centro de Estudos em Psicologia da Saúde · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRCentro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVentriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is the primary therapy for hydrocephalus in children; however, this technique is amenable to malfunctions, which could be detected through an assessment of clinical signs and imaging results. Furthermore, early detection can prevent patient deterioration and guide clinical and surgical treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 5-year-old female with a premedical history of neonatal IVH, secondary hydrocephalus, multiple VP shunts revisions, and slit ventricle syndrome was evaluated using a noninvasive intracranial pressure monitor device at the early stages of the clinical symptoms, evidencing increased intracranial pressure and poor brain compliance. Serial MRI images demonstrated a slight ventricular enlargement, leading to the use of a gravitational VP shunt, promoting progressive improvement. On the follow-up visits, we used the noninvasive ICP monitoring device to guide the shunt adjustments until symptom resolution. Furthermore, the patient has been asymptomatic for the past 3 years without requiring new shunt revisions. DISCUSSION: Slit ventricle syndrome and VP shunt dysfunctions are challenging diagnoses for the neurosurgeon. The noninvasive intracranial monitoring has allowed a closer follow-up assisting early assessment of brain compliance changes related to a patient's symptomatology. Furthermore, this technique has high sensitivity and specificity in detecting alterations in the intracranial pressure, serving as a guide for the adjustments of programmable VP shunts, which may improve the patient's quality of life.

conclusionNoninvasive ICP monitoring may lead to a less invasive assessment of patients with slit ventricle syndrome and could be used as a guide for adjustments of programmable shunts.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusVentriculoperitoneal ShuntBrainChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntracranial PressureQuality of LifeSlit Ventricle SyndromeHydrocephalusIntracranial pressureNeurological Diagnostic TechniquesPoint-of-care systemSlit ventricle syndromeVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID36976418
OpenAlexW4361190820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.