Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976386›Full record

ReviewNano-micro letters2023

The Critical Role of Fillers in Composite Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Battery.

Xueying Yang, Jiaxiang Liu, Nanbiao Pei, Zhiqiang Chen, Ruiyang Li, Lijun Fu, Peng Zhang, Jinbao Zhao

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nano-micro letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Stabilizing NaACS omega · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Recent advances in TiNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xueying YangCollege of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxiang LiuCollege of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, People's Republic of China.
Nanbiao PeiCollege of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, People's Republic of China.
Zhiqiang ChenCollege of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, People's Republic of China.
Ruiyang LiState Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemistry for Energy Materials, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, Engineering Research Center of Electrochemical Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, People's Republic of China.
Lijun FuCollege of Energy, Nanjing Technical University, Nanjing, 211816, People's Republic of China. lijunfufu@sina.com.
Peng ZhangCollege of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, People's Republic of China. pengzhang@xmu.edu.cn.
Jinbao ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemistry for Energy Materials, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, Engineering Research Center of Electrochemical Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, People's Republic of China. jbzhao@xmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With excellent energy densities and highly safe performance, solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) have been hailed as promising energy storage devices. Solid-state electrolyte is the core component of SSLBs and plays an essential role in the safety and electrochemical performance of the cells. Composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) are considered as one of the most promising candidates among all solid-state electrolytes due to their excellent comprehensive performance. In this review, we briefly introduce the components of CPEs, such as the polymer matrix and the species of fillers, as well as the integration of fillers in the polymers. In particular, we focus on the two major obstacles that affect the development of CPEs: the low ionic conductivity of the electrolyte and high interfacial impedance. We provide insight into the factors influencing ionic conductivity, in terms of macroscopic and microscopic aspects, including the aggregated structure of the polymer, ion migration rate and carrier concentration. In addition, we also discuss the electrode-electrolyte interface and summarize methods for improving this interface. It is expected that this review will provide feasible solutions for modifying CPEs through further understanding of the ion conduction mechanism in CPEs and for improving the compatibility of the electrode-electrolyte interface.

Indexed as

Composite polymer electrolytesElectrode–electrolyte interfaceFillersIonic conductivity

Identifiers

PMID36976386
PMCPMC10050671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read93
table measurements read39
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.