Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976341›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Clinical and radiological outcomes of one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage for three-column uncomplicated subaxial type «B» injures: a multicenter retrospective study.

Vadim A Byvaltsev, Andrei A Kalinin, Evgenii G Belykh, Marat A Aliyev, Bair B Sanzhin, Alexander V Kukharev, Yermek K Dyussembekov, Valerii V Shepelev, K Daniel Riew

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vadim A ByvaltsevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia. byval75vadim@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-7101
Andrei A KalininDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-4344
Evgenii G BelykhDepartment of Neurosurgery, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-5739
Marat A AliyevAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-2395
Bair B SanzhinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-4956
Alexander V KukharevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-5800
Yermek K DyussembekovAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5245-0797
Valerii V ShepelevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-8115
K Daniel RiewDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2083-9375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical and radiological results of the operative management of three-column uncomplicated type «B» subaxial injures treated with a one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage.

methodsThis study included 72 patients with a three-column uncomplicated type «B» subaxial injures who met the inclusion criteria, underwent a one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage at one of three neurosurgical departments between 2005 and 2020, and were followed up for clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 3-yr follow-up.

resultsThere was a decrease in the VAS pain score from an average of 80 mm to 7 mm (p = 0.03); a decrease in the average NDI score from 62 to 14% (p = 0.01); excellent and good outcomes according to Macnab's scale were 93% (n = 67/72). There was an average change in the cervical lordosis (Cobb method) from -9.10 to -15.40 (p = 0.007), without significant loss of lordosis (p = 0.27). There was no significant degeneration of the adjacent levels by 3 years post-op. The fusion rate, using the Cervical Spine Research Society criteria, was poor: it was 62.5% (n = 45/72), and using the CT criteria, it was 65.3% (n = 47/72). 15.4% patients (n = 11/72) suffered complications. Statistical difference between the fusion and pseudoarthrosis (according to X-ray criteria) subgroups showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the smoking status, diabetes, chronic steroid use, cervical injury level, subtypes of AO type B subaxial injuries and types of expandable cage systems.

conclusionsOne-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage, despite a poor fusion rate, can be considered a feasible and relatively safe method for treating three-column uncomplicated subaxial type «B» injures, with the benefit of immediate stability, anatomical reduction, and direct decompression of the spinal cord. While no one in our series had any catastrophic complications, we did note a high complication rate.

Indexed as

LordosisSpinal FusionCervical VertebraeHumansNeckRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCervical spineCorpectomyTelescopic prosthesesTransbody fusionUncomplicated three-column subaxial type «B» injuresVentral decompression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.