ArticleJournal of vision2023
Fixation-related visual mismatch negativity.
Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual punctuation: fixational eye movements reveal segmentation of auditory streams.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Oculomotor chronometry of spoken word structure processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Children with Autism Show Impaired Oculomotor Entrainment to Predictable Stimuli.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Oculomotor inhibition markers of working memory load.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fixation-related visual mismatch negativity.Journal of vision · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision under natural conditions could be studied by combining electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking as well as using saccades as triggers for the onset of the fixation-related potentials (FRPs) and for the oculomotor inhibition (OMI) that follows every saccade. The result of this analysis is thought to be equivalent to the event-related response following a peripheral preview. Previous studies that measured responses to visual deviants in a sequence of flashed stimuli found an increased negativity in the occipital N1 component (visual mismatch negativity [vMMN]), and prolonged saccadic inhibition for unexpected events. The aim of the current study was to develop an oddball paradigm in constrained natural-viewing and determine whether a similar mismatched FRP and prolonged OMI for deviance could be found. To this end, we developed a visual oddball paradigm on a static display to generate expectancy and surprise across successive saccades. Observers (n = 26) inspected, one after the other, seven small patterns of E and an inverted E arranged on the screen along a horizontal path, with one frequent (standard) and one rare (deviant), looking for a superimposed tiny dot target in each 5-second trial. Our results show a significantly larger FRP-N1 negativity for the deviant, compared with the standard and prolonged OMI of the following saccade, as previously found for transient oddballs. Our results show, for the first time, prolonged OMI and stronger fixation-related N1 to a task-irrelevant visual mismatch (vMMN) in natural, but task-guided viewing. These two signals combined could serve as markers of prediction error in free viewing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.