Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976106›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability and the Effect of Experience in Cine-MRI for Adhesion Detection.

Bram de Wilde, Frank Joosten, Wulphert Venderink, Mirjam E J Davidse, Juliëtte Geurts, Hanneke Kruijt, Afke Vermeulen, Bibi Martens, Maxime V P Schyns, Josephine C B M Huige and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Bram de WildeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1890-8714
Frank JoostenDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Wulphert VenderinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-671X
Mirjam E J DavidseFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-509X
Juliëtte GeurtsFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Hanneke KruijtFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Afke VermeulenFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Bibi MartensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3105-6640
Maxime V P SchynsDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Josephine C B M HuigeDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Myrte C de BoerDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Bart A R ToninoDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Herman J A ZandvoortDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Kirsti LammertRadiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Helka ParviainenRadiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Aino-Maija VuorinenRadiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Suvi SyvärantaRadiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Ruben R M VogelsDepartment of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, 7512 KZ Enschede, The Netherlands.
Wiesje PrinsDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Andrea CoppolaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-6693
Nancy BossaDepartment of Radiology, Centro Radiologico Dr Gomez Pereda, 50004 Zaragoza, Spain.
Richard P G Ten BroekDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4012-7968
Henkjan HuismanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rijnstate Hospital · NLHelsinki University Hospital · FIRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Twente · NLMaastricht University · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NL

Funding

Maag Lever Darm Stichting D18-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cine-MRI for adhesion detection is a promising novel modality that can help the large group of patients developing pain after abdominal surgery. Few studies into its diagnostic accuracy are available, and none address observer variability. This retrospective study explores the inter- and intra-observer variability, diagnostic accuracy, and the effect of experience. A total of 15 observers with a variety of experience reviewed 61 sagittal cine-MRI slices, placing box annotations with a confidence score at locations suspect for adhesions. Five observers reviewed the slices again one year later. Inter- and intra-observer variability are quantified using Fleiss' (inter) and Cohen's (intra) κ and percentage agreement. Diagnostic accuracy is quantified with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on a consensus standard. Inter-observer Fleiss' κ values range from 0.04 to 0.34, showing poor to fair agreement. High general and cine-MRI experience led to significantly (

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imaging(MeSH)observer variationtissue adhesions

Identifiers

PMID36976106
PMCPMC10054690
OpenAlexW4321596989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.