Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976092›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Long-Term Degradation Assessment of a Polyurethane-Based Surgical Adhesive-Assessment and Critical Consideration of Preclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Testing.

Lisanne Bremer, Kerstin Hagemeister, Michaela Moss, Lisa Ernst, René H Tolba, Stefan Jockenhoevel, Christian Apel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisanne BremerDepartment of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-0245
Kerstin HagemeisterAdhesys Medical GmbH, 52078 Aachen, Germany.
Michaela MossInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Lisa ErnstInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3808-4222
René H TolbaInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Stefan JockenhoevelDepartment of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0584-9444
Christian ApelDepartment of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1339-1990
RWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

Adhesys Medical GmbH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue adhesives constitute a great possibility to improve conventional wound closure. In contrast to sutures, they enable nearly immediate hemostasis and can prevent fluid or air leaks. In the present study, a poly(ester)urethane-based adhesive was investigated which already proved to be suitable for different indications, such as reinforcing vascular anastomosis and sealing liver tissue. Using in vitro and in vivo setups, the degradation of the adhesives was monitored over a period of up to 2 years, to evaluate long-term biocompatibility and determine degradation kinetics. For the first time, the complete degradation of the adhesive was documented. In subcutaneous locations, tissue residues were found after 12 months and in intramuscular locations, tissue degradation was complete after about 6 months. A detailed histological evaluation of the local tissue reaction revealed good biocompatibility throughout the different degradation stages. After full degradation, complete remodeling to physiological tissue was observed at the implant locations. In addition, this study critically discusses common issues related to the assessment of biomaterial degradation kinetics in the context of medical device certification. This work highlighted the importance and encouraged the implementation of biologically relevant in vitro degradation models to replace animal studies or at least reduce the number of animals in preclinical testing prior to clinical studies. Moreover, the suitability of frequently used implantation studies based on ISO 10993-6 at standard locations was critically discussed, especially in light of the associated lack of reliable predictions for degradation kinetics at the clinically relevant site of implantation.

Indexed as

animal implantation modelbiodegradable surgical sealantbiomaterial degradationlong-term biocompatibilitypolyurethane adhesive

Identifiers

PMID36976092
PMCPMC10058192
OpenAlexW4328108255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.