Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976070›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Ceramic Materials for Biomedical Applications: An Overview on Properties and Fabrication Processes.

Lorenzo Vaiani, Antonio Boccaccio, Antonio Emmanuele Uva, Gianfranco Palumbo, Antonio Piccininni, Pasquale Guglielmi, Stefania Cantore, Luigi Santacroce, Ioannis Alexandros Charitos, Andrea Ballini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Bifunctional biomaterials: An innovative strategy for synergistic bone tumor therapy and bone regeneration].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lorenzo VaianiDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-7775
Antonio BoccaccioDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-7189
Antonio Emmanuele UvaDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-6137
Gianfranco PalumboDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0442-1964
Antonio PiccininniDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5977-5271
Pasquale GuglielmiDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4176-0770
Stefania CantoreIndependent Researcher, Sorriso & Benessere-Ricerca e Clinica, 70129 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-2521
Luigi SantacroceMicrobiology and Virology Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5671-8124
Ioannis Alexandros CharitosEmergency/Urgency Department, National Poisoning Center, Riuniti University Hospital of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3527-7483
Andrea BalliniDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8758-1415

Funding

Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research Project "CONTACT", ARS01_01205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing interest in creating advanced biomaterials with specific physical and chemical properties is currently being observed. These high-standard materials must be capable to integrate into biological environments such as the oral cavity or other anatomical regions in the human body. Given these requirements, ceramic biomaterials offer a feasible solution in terms of mechanical strength, biological functionality, and biocompatibility. In this review, the fundamental physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of the main ceramic biomaterials and ceramic nanocomposites are drawn, along with some primary related applications in biomedical fields, such as orthopedics, dentistry, and regenerative medicine. Furthermore, an in-depth focus on bone-tissue engineering and biomimetic ceramic scaffold design and fabrication is presented.

Indexed as

bioceramicsbiomaterialsbone tissue engineeringdentistry

Identifiers

PMID36976070
PMCPMC10052110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.