ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2023
Biodegradable Cements for Bone Regeneration.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Calcium Phosphate-Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Literature Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Part 1-Biomaterials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Biomaterial-based strategies for bone cement: modulating the bone microenvironment and promoting regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Bone void filler materials for augmentation in comminuted fractures: a comprehensive review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Modification of Ti13Nb13Zr Alloy Surface via Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation and Silver Nanoparticles Decorating.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A biodegradable magnesium phosphate cement incorporating chitosan and rhBMP-2 designed for bone defect repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Biocomposite Cements for Bone Defect Repair in Rat Models.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Active Biomedical Materials and Their Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of femoral bone loss: uncemented vs. cemented aseptic stem loosening in first-time revision surgery-a retrospective evaluation of 215 patients.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing bioactivity and mechanical performances of hydroxyapatite-calcium sulfate bone cements for bone repair:RSC advances · 2024Article
- Current and Future Perspectives of Bioactive Glasses as Injectable Material.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Bioactive Degradable Composite Bone Cement Based on Calcium Sulfate and Magnesium Polyphosphate.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Perfusion Window Chambers Enable Interventional Analyses of Tumor Microenvironments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Development of Hydroxyapatite Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants from Colloidal Solutions: Part 2-Detailed Characterisation of the Coatings and Their Growth Mechanism.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Overview of Magnesium-Phosphate-Based Cements as Bone Repair Materials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Calcium Phosphate Cements as Carriers of Functional Substances for the Treatment of Bone Tissue.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bone cements such as polymethyl methacrylate and calcium phosphates have been widely used for the reconstruction of bone. Despite their remarkable clinical success, the low degradation rate of these materials hampers a broader clinical use. Matching the degradation rate of the materials with neo bone formation remains a challenge for bone-repairing materials. Moreover, questions such as the mechanism of degradation and how the composition of the materials contribute to the degradation property remain unanswered. Therefore, the review provides an overview of currently used biodegradable bone cements such as calcium phosphates (CaP), calcium sulfates and organic-inorganic composites. The possible degradation mechanism and clinical performance of the biodegradable cements are summarized. This paper reviews up-to-date research and applications of biodegradable cements, hoping to provide researchers in the field with inspirations and references.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.