Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36976052›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Marginal Bone Level and Biomechanical Behavior of Titanium-Indexed Abutment Base of Conical Connection Used for Single Ceramic Crowns on Morse-Taper Implant: A Clinical Retrospective Study.

Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, Antonio Scarano, Guillermo Castro Cortellari, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita, Marco Aurélio Bianchini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Sergio Alexandre GehrkeDepartment of Research, Bioface/PgO/UCAM, Calle Cuareim 1483, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-9101
Antonio ScaranoDepartment of Research, Bioface/PgO/UCAM, Calle Cuareim 1483, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-6146
Guillermo Castro CortellariDepartment of Research, Bioface/PgO/UCAM, Calle Cuareim 1483, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay.
Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira FernandesPeriodontics and Oral Medicine Department, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-4390
Alfredo Mikail Melo MesquitaDepartment of Implantology, Paulista University (UNIP), São Paulo 01311-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4273-1448
Marco Aurélio BianchiniPost-Graduate Program in Implant Dentistry (PPGO), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil.
Centro Uruguayo de Imagenología Molecular · UYUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Paulista · BRUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the behavior of Morse-taper indexed abutments by analyzing the marginal bone level (MBL) after at least 12 months of function. Patients rehabilitated with single ceramic crowns between May 2015 and December 2020 received single Morse-taper connection implants (DuoCone implant) with two-piece straight abutment baseT used for at least 12 months, presenting periapical radiograph immediately after crown installation were enrolled. The position of the rehabilitated tooth and arch (maxilla or mandible), crown installation period, implant dimensions, abutment transmucosal height, installation site (immediate implant placement or healed area), associated with bone regeneration, immediate provisionalization, and complications after installation of the final crown were analyzed. The initial and final MBL was evaluated by comparing the initial and final X-rays. The level of significance was α = 0.05. Seventy-five patients (49 women and 26 men) enrolled had a mean period of evaluation of 22.7 ± 6.2 months. Thirty-one implant-abutment (IA) sets had between 12-18 months, 34 between 19-24 months, and 44 between 25-33 months. Only one patient failed due to an abutment fracture after 25 months of function. Fifty-eight implants were placed in the maxilla (53.2%) and 51 in the mandible (46.8%). Seventy-four implants were installed in healed sites (67.9%), and 35 were in fresh socket sites (32.1%). Thirty-two out of these 35 implants placed in fresh sockets had the gap filled with bone graft particles. Twenty-six implants received immediate provisionalization. The average MBL was -0.67 ± 0.65 mm in mesial and -0.70 ± 0.63 mm in distal (

Indexed as

abutmentdental implantrehabilitationretrospective studysingle ceramic crown

Identifiers

PMID36976052
PMCPMC10057670
OpenAlexW4322502357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.