Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975883›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2023

Impact of Insulin-Treated Compared to Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus on Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: The Randomized BASKET-SMALL 2 Trial.

Julia Seeger, Jochen Wöhrle, Bruno Scheller, Ahmed Farah, Marc-Alexander Ohlow, Norman Mangner, Sven Möbius-Winkler, Daniel Weilenmann, Georg Stachel, Gregor Leibundgut and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Drug-coated balloons and diabetes: a review.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia SeegerMedical Campus Lake Constance, Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, 88048 Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Jochen WöhrleMedical Campus Lake Constance, Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, 88048 Friedrichshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9915-1815
Bruno SchellerClinical and Experimental Interventional Cardiology, University of Saarland, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Ahmed FarahKnappschaftskrankenhaus, Klinikum Westfalen, 44143 Dortmund, Germany.
Marc-Alexander OhlowSRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, 07548 Gera, Germany.
Norman MangnerHerzzentrum Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-7923
Sven Möbius-WinklerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Daniel WeilenmannCantonal Hospital St Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Georg StachelHeart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Gregor LeibundgutCantonal Hospital Baselland, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland.
Peter RickenbacherUniversity Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.
Marco CattaneoUniversity Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6610-8431
Nicole GilgenUniversity Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph KaiserUniversity Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.
Raban JegerDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-5491
On Behalf Of The Basket-Small Investigators
University of Basel · CHJena University Hospital · DEKlinikum Westfalen (Germany) · DESaarland University · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DETriemli Hospital · CHUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the outcome of PCI of de novo stenosis with drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (NITDM).

methodsPatients were randomized in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial to DCB or DES and followed over 3 years for MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]). Outcome in the diabetic subgroup (

resultsIn NITDM patients (

conclusionsDCB compared to DES for treatment of de novo coronary lesions in diabetic patients was associated with similar rates of MACE and numerically lower need for TVR both for ITDM and NITDM patients.

Indexed as

diabetes mellitusdrug-coated balloondrug-eluting stentsmall vessel diseasetarget vessel revascularization

Identifiers

PMID36975883
PMCPMC10057565
OpenAlexW4324052672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.