ArticleDentistry journal2023
Histological Evaluation of Root Canals by Performing a New Cleaning Protocol "RUA" in Endodontic Surgery.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The potential associations of periapical lesions on endodontic microsurgery with guided bone regeneration: a retrospective analysis of 23 cases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- SEM Analysis and Pulp Tissue Dissolution Following Retrograde Preparation and Irrigation in Surgical Endodontics: A Novel Approach.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
- A new cleaning protocol in minimally invasive endodontic surgery: RUA ("retro irrigant activation").Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo enhance cleaning during retro-preparation in endodontic microsurgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty mandibular premolars were instrumented, filled with a single cone technique, and then retro-preparation was performed and assigned to experiment A. In group A1, the cavity created by the retro preparation was cleansed with 2 mL of normal sterile saline. In group A2, the retro cavity was cleaned with 2 mL of sterile saline after the retro preparation. All the irrigation solutions mentioned above were delivered using an endodontic needle with a lateral vent and a gauge of 30. Subsequently, in group A2, 17% EDTA gel and 5.25% gel were inserted into the cavity and activated using ultrasonic tips. After the irrigation protocols, the specimens were decalcified for histological evaluation.
resultsIn the experiment, the amount of hard tissue debris was significantly greater in group A1 compared to group A2 (
conclusionsThe samples in group A2, where the new protocol was performed, showed statistically significant results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.