Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975560›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2023

Comparison of Lasers and Desensitizing Agents in Dentinal Hypersensitivity Therapy.

Francesca Cattoni, Lucrezia Ferrante, Sara Mandile, Giulia Tetè, Elisabetta Maria Polizzi, Giorgio Gastaldi

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca CattoniDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-3074
Lucrezia FerranteDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Sara MandileDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Giulia TetèDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta Maria PolizziDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GastaldiDepartment of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of this review is to verify the validity of laser therapy in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, an extremely common problem in patients, with Nd: YAG lasers or high- and/or low-power diode lasers to obtain a definitive protocol for the treatment of hypersensitivity, given the multiplicity of laser treatments proposed by the numerous authors evaluated. The authors performed an electronic search on PubMed, favouring it as a search engine. Lasers represent a means of treating dentin hypersensitivity, used alone and/or in conjunction with specific products for the treatment of such a pathology. The selected articles that examined diode lasers were divided according to the wattage (w) used: low-level laser therapy protocols, i.e., those using a wattage of less than 1 W, and high-level laser therapy protocols, i.e., those using a wattage of 1 W or more. Regarding the Nd: YAG laser, it was not necessary to subdivide the studies in this way, as they used a wattage of 1 W or more. A total of 21 articles were included in the final selection. Laser therapy was found to be effective in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. However, the level of effectiveness depends on the laser used. The results obtained from this review show that both the Nd: YAG laser and the diode laser (high and low power) are effective in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. However, the high-power laser appears to be more effective in combination with fluoride varnish and the Nd: YAG laser achieved greater long-term benefits than the diode laser.

Indexed as

dentin exposurehypersensitivity and diode laserhypersensitivity and Nd-Yag lasersensitive dentine

Identifiers

PMID36975560
PMCPMC10047334
OpenAlexW4322500636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.