Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975482›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Implementation of a Web-Based Communication System for Primary Care Providers and Cancer Specialists.

Bojana Petrovic, Jacqueline L Bender, Clare Liddy, Amir Afkham, Sharon F McGee, Scott C Morgan, Roanne Segal, Mary Ann O'Brien, Jim A Julian, Jonathan Sussman and 4 more

Full text readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bojana PetrovicDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Jacqueline L BenderDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Clare LiddyBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-5494
Amir AfkhamOntario Health East, Ottawa, ON K1J 1J8, Canada.
Sharon F McGeeThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Scott C MorganThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Roanne SegalThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Mary Ann O'BrienDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.
Jim A JulianDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada.
Jonathan SussmanDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7702-8816
Robin UrquhartDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 1V7, Canada.
Margaret FitchBloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada.
Nancy D SchneiderCanIMPACT Patient Advisory Committee, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.
Eva GrunfeldDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.

Funding

CIHR TT7-128272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare providers have reported challenges with coordinating care for patients with cancer. Digital technology tools have brought new possibilities for improving care coordination. A web- and text-based asynchronous system (eOncoNote) was implemented in Ottawa, Canada for cancer specialists and primary care providers (PCPs). This study aimed to examine PCPs' experiences of implementing eOncoNote and how access to the system influenced communication between PCPs and cancer specialists. As part of a larger study, we collected and analyzed system usage data and administered an end-of-discussion survey to understand the perceived value of using eOncoNote. eOncoNote data were analyzed for 76 shared patients (33 patients receiving treatment and 43 patients in the survivorship phase). Thirty-nine percent of the PCPs responded to the cancer specialist's initial eOncoNote message and nearly all of those sent only one message. Forty-five percent of the PCPs completed the survey. Most PCPs reported no additional benefits of using eOncoNote and emphasized the need for electronic medical record (EMR) integration. Over half of the PCPs indicated that eOncoNote could be a helpful service if they had questions about a patient. Future research should examine opportunities for EMR integration and whether additional interventions could support communication between PCPs and cancer specialists.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDigital TechnologyInternet AccessOncologistsPhysicians, Primary CareBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleNurse PractitionersNursesProstatic Neoplasmscancercoordination of careelectronic communicationimplementationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID36975482
PMCPMC10047665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read38
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.