Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975424›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

John Whitaker, Carolyn Nessim, Max Almond, Samuel J Ford

Registry-linked trialFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06480396 (An International, Partially-randomised, Patient-preference Trial Within a Registry of High Versus Lower Intensity Radiological Surveillance Following Primary Resection of Retroperitoneal, Abdominal and Pelvic Soft Tissue Sarcoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06480396 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An International, Partially-randomised, Patient-preference Trial Within a Registry of High Versus Lower Intensity Radiological Surveillance Following Primary Resection of Retroperitoneal, Abdominal and Pelvic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2024 to 2033Enrolled584ConditionsSarcoma,Soft Tissue, Sarcoma RetroperitonealArmsHigh-intensity radiological surveillance, Lower-intensity radiological surveillance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John WhitakerMidlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Carolyn NessimDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ottowa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0419-3511
Max AlmondMidlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Samuel J FordMidlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.

Indexed as

Retroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiesdiagnostic imaginghealth servicesretroperitoneal neoplasmssarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36975424
PMCPMC10047263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.