Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975349›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Two-Step Approach to Overcoming Data Imbalance in the Development of an Electrocardiography Data Quality Assessment Algorithm: A Real-World Data Challenge.

Hyun Joo Kim, S Jayakumar Venkat, Hyoung Woo Chang, Yang Hyun Cho, Jee Yang Lee, Kyunghee Koo

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyun Joo KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1963-8955
S Jayakumar VenkatDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si 13620, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung Woo ChangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si 13620, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5516-0333
Yang Hyun ChoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1685-3641
Jee Yang LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si 13620, Republic of Korea.
Kyunghee KooDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si 13620, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI21C1324Seoul National University Bundang Hospital 02-2022-0041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuously acquired biosignals from patient monitors contain significant amounts of unusable data. During the development of a decision support system based on continuously acquired biosignals, we developed machine and deep learning algorithms to automatically classify the quality of ECG data. A total of 31,127 twenty-s ECG segments of 250 Hz were used as the training/validation dataset. Data quality was categorized into three classes: acceptable, unacceptable, and uncertain. In the training/validation dataset, 29,606 segments (95%) were in the acceptable class. Two one-step, three-class approaches and two two-step binary sequential approaches were developed using random forest (RF) and two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D CNN) classifiers. Four approaches were tested on 9779 test samples from another hospital. On the test dataset, the two-step 2D CNN approach showed the best overall accuracy (0.85), and the one-step, three-class 2D CNN approach showed the worst overall accuracy (0.54). The most important parameter, precision in the acceptable class, was greater than 0.9 for all approaches, but recall in the acceptable class was better for the two-step approaches: one-step (0.77) vs. two-step RF (0.89) and one-step (0.51) vs. two-step 2D CNN (0.94) (

Indexed as

electrocardiographymachine learningrandom forestsignal quality

Identifiers

PMID36975349
PMCPMC10046279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.