Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975331›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Effects of Intrusion of Anterior Teeth by Skeletal Anchorage in Deep Bite Patients; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Erfan Bardideh, Golnaz Tamizi, Hooman Shafaee, Abdolrasoul Rangrazi, Mahsa Ghorbani, Navid Kerayechian

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erfan BardidehDental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran.
Golnaz TamiziSchool of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran.
Hooman ShafaeeDental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7924-4654
Abdolrasoul RangraziDental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran.
Mahsa GhorbaniSchool of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran.
Navid KerayechianDepartment of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY 10011, USA.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRNew York University · US

Funding

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 4001688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep bite is known as one of the most common malocclusions, and its treatment and retention are often challenging. The use of mini-screws has been suggested as an ideal method for the intrusion of incisors in deep-bite patients. Still, there are conflicting reports regarding the superiority of this method compared to other common treatments.

aimThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of the intrusion of anterior teeth by skeletal anchorage in deep bite patients.

methodsFrom the beginning to 15 September 2022, articles on the topic of interest were searched in electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane's CENTRAL. Additionally, a hand search for pertinent studies and a search of the grey literature were carried out. After the selection of eligible studies, data extraction was performed using piloted forms. Inverse-variance random-effects meta-analyses were used to combine the outcome measures of dental indices, skeletal cephalometric indices, and dental cephalometric indices.

resultsA total of 15 studies (6 RCT; 9 CCT) were included in the systematic review and 14 were used in the meta-analyses. The differences in overbite changes (MD = -0.45,

conclusionThe use of mini-screws leads to lower overbite and higher true intrusion (about 0.45 and 0.62 mm, respectively) compared to the use of other methods for intruding upper incisors. Furthermore, the effect of TAD on extrusion of molar teeth is less (by 0.4 mm) than other methods.

Indexed as

anterior teethBurstone’s intrusion archdeep biteintrusionmini-screwskeletal anchorageutility arch

Identifiers

PMID36975331
PMCPMC10046359
OpenAlexW4323043270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read31
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.