ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Convergence of 3D Bioprinting and Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovations in the management of urethral stricture disease: emerging and regenerative strategies.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- 3D-Bioprinted Multifunctional Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone-Periodontal Ligament-Root Cementum Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Role of polymeric nanocomposite for tissue engineering applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Innovations in skin microphysiological systems for nonclinical testing and FDA modernization.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- The promising applications of 3D printing technology for diagnosis and therapy of cancer: Recent advances and challenges.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D bioprinting for medical application: opportunities and challenges.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Wound Repair: From Biology to Therapeutic Innovation.Cells · 2025Review
- The Role and Involvement of Functional Three-Dimensional Porcine-Derived Collagen Matrix Biomaterials in Periodontal Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Bionanomaterials or Nanobiomaterials: Differences in Definitions and Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Targeting diabetic foot ulcer pathophysiology: altered signaling pathways and 3D scaffold as an emerging treatment strategy.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Design and Applications of Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.Cells · 2025Review
- Machine Learning in Predicting and Optimizing Polymer Printability for 3D Bioprinting.Polymers · 2025Review
- Enhancing Wound Healing Through Secretome-Loaded 3D-Printed Biomaterials.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Pharmaceutical 3D Printing Technology Integrating Nanomaterials and Nanodevices for Precision Neurological Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- 3D-bioprinted urethral grafts: Revolutionizing urethral stricture treatment.Arab journal of urology · 2025Review
- Advances in regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration and rejuvenation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The cutting-edge progress in bioprinting for biomedicine: principles, applications, and future perspectives.MedComm · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising scaffold fabrication strategy for tissue engineering with excellent control over scaffold geometry and microstructure. Nanobiomaterials as bioinks play a key role in manipulating the cellular microenvironment to alter its growth and development. This review first introduces the commonly used nanomaterials in tissue engineering scaffolds, including natural polymers, synthetic polymers, and polymer derivatives, and reveals the improvement of nanomaterials on scaffold performance. Second, the 3D bioprinting technologies of inkjet-based bioprinting, extrusion-based bioprinting, laser-assisted bioprinting, and stereolithography bioprinting are comprehensively itemized, and the advantages and underlying mechanisms are revealed. Then the convergence of 3D bioprinting and nanotechnology applications in tissue engineering scaffolds, such as bone, nerve, blood vessel, tendon, and internal organs, are discussed. Finally, the challenges and perspectives of convergence of 3D bioprinting and nanotechnology are proposed. This review will provide scientific guidance to develop 3D bioprinting tissue engineering scaffolds by nanotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.