Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975287›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Comparative Analysis of Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Learning.

Marcel Pikhart, Blanka Klimova, Anna Cierniak-Emerych, Szymon Dziuba

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcel PikhartFaculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-9332
Blanka KlimovaFaculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-9766
Anna Cierniak-EmerychFaculty of Informatics and Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland.
Szymon DziubaFaculty of Informatics and Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-5843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of electronic media has increased dramatically in the past decade due to the general increase in digitization of global societies. This trend has been recently enhanced by the COVID-19 occurrence and following forced implementation of various forms of eLearning into university curricula, including all forms of second language (L2) acquisition. The present study focuses on the evaluation of perceived advantages and disadvantages of online L2 acquisition via electronic media by university students of the Czech Republic (n = 114) and Poland (n = 121). The research methodology was an online questionnaire asking the users of digital media for L2 acquisition about their perceived advantages and disadvantages regarding the use of print and digital media and their potential impact on their L2 acquisition. To understand their evaluation is crucial as it could lead to increased motivation or demotivation to learn a foreign language. The results clearly show that the students realize the drawbacks of digital media and this could lead to their dissatisfaction and frustration when they have to use these media excessively. The implications of the findings could be helpful and necessary for various course designers, curricula makers, and course tutors as they are responsible for the smooth implementation of various digital tools into the educational process.

Indexed as

applied linguisticsFLLL2 acquisition

Identifiers

PMID36975287
PMCPMC10045390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.