Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36975248›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A New Explanation for the Attitude-Behavior Inconsistency Based on the Contextualized Attitude.

Yuan Yuan, Rui Sun, Jiajia Zuo, Xue Chen

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan YuanSchool of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Rui SunSchool of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Jiajia ZuoSchool of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Xue ChenSchool of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362000, China.

Funding

Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Project of the Ministry of Education, PRC Grant No. 20YJA630054National Social Sciences later funded projects, PRC Grant No. 21FGLB041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inconsistency between attitude and behavior is a major obstacle to research on the predictive power of attitudes on behavior. To clarify the mechanism underlying such inconsistency, we combined event-related potential (ERP) and questionnaires to explore the relationship between contextualized attitudes and retrospective attitudes in the context of illusion of privacy empowerment (IPE). When the participants read the IPE events (including platform empowerment intention, technique, result, etc.) on slides, we measured retrospective attitudes with questionnaires and recorded contextualized attitudes with ERPs. We found that individuals' retrospective attitudes were different from contextualized attitudes: retrospective attitudes were mainly affected by the individual's analytic system, while contextualized attitudes were mainly affected by the direct stimulus-response (i.e., heuristic system). Therefore, retrospective attitudes may not accurately reflect individual cognition in the immediate context, and inconsistency between attitudes and behavior may be caused by the mismatch between retrospective attitudes and immediate behavior. Our findings provide a more reasonable account of the relationship between attitudes and behavior.

Indexed as

attitude-behavior inconsistencycontextualized attitudeevent-related potentialsillusion of privacy empowermentretrospective attitude

Identifiers

PMID36975248
PMCPMC10045271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.