Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36974965›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2023

Buccaneer model building with neural network fragment selection.

Emad Alharbi, Radu Calinescu, Kevin Cowtan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emad AlharbiDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5GH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-4865
Radu CalinescuDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5GH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-9260
Kevin CowtanDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-1437

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S005099/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracing the backbone is a critical step in protein model building, as incorrect tracing leads to poor protein models. Here, a neural network trained to identify unfavourable fragments and remove them from the model-building process in order to improve backbone tracing is presented. Moreover, a decision tree was trained to select an optimal threshold to eliminate unfavourable fragments. The neural network was tested on experimental phasing data sets from the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (JCSG), recently deposited experimental phasing data sets (from 2015 to 2021) and molecular-replacement data sets. The experimental results show that using the neural network in the Buccaneer protein-model-building software can produce significantly more complete protein models than those built using Buccaneer alone. In particular, Buccaneer with the neural network built protein models with a completeness that was at least 5% higher for 25% and 50% of the original and truncated resolution JCSG experimental phasing data sets, respectively, for 28% of the recently collected experimental phasing data sets and for 43% of the molecular-replacement data sets.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareCrystallography, X-RayModels, MolecularNeural Networks, ComputerProtein ConformationProteinsBuccaneermodel buildingneural networksstructure solution

Identifiers

PMID36974965
PMCPMC10071564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.