SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 39 Overexpression in solid Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the cancerous nexus: the pivotal and diverse roles of USP39 in cancer development.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of the role of ubiquitin-specific peptidases in colorectal cancer: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Deubiquitinases in Ovarian Cancer: Role in Drug Resistance and Tumor Aggressiveness.International journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between USP39 expression, the prognosis of patients with solid cancer, and to identify the clinicopathological characteristics of these patients. MATERIAL AND
methodThis study was carried out using PRISMA strategy. Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Ebsco, Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published up to April 2022. 14 studies was included in this study. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) data were collected, including number of samples, detection methods, number of sample with high USP39 expression, and cut-off value. HR and 95% CI was used to evaluate the prognostic value of USP39 expression. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was used to assess the effect of USP39 expression on clinicopathological parameters.
resultsQualitative analysis using 14 included studies and quantitative analysis using 7 included studies. We found that USP39 expression has significant risk for histological grade (OR 3.14, CI 95% 2.15-4.58, p<0.001), TNM stage (OR 2.23, CI 95% 1.66-3.00, p<0.001), tumor size (OR 2.17, CI 95% 1.56-3.03, p<0.001), lymph node metastasis (OR 2.31, CI 95% 1.23-4.33, p=0.009), vascular invasion (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.13-2.73, p=0.01). Furthermore, high expression of USP39 protein was associated with worse OS (OR 1.17, CI 95% 1.13-1.21, p<0.001) and DFS (OR 1.39, CI 95% 1.23-1.57, p<0.001) in cancer patients.
conclusionIt can be concluded that USP39 has a significant prognostic value in patients with solid cancer and was found to have a significant relationship in the clinicopathology of solid cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.