ArticleMethodsX2023
An overview of the methods for evaluating the resilience of groundwater systems.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Endocannabinoid-Microbiota-Neuroimmune Super-System: A Unifying Feedback Architecture for Systems Resilience, Collapse Trajectories, and Precision Feedback Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Detecting the effects of opencast mining on ecosystem services value in arid and semi-arid areas based on time-series remote sensing images and Google Earth Engine (GEE).BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, groundwater resources are under anthropogenic and natural pressures. Depending on various factors, aquifers have diverse responses toward stresses. Resilience is among the performance criteria determining the ability of an aquifer to withstand unfavorable circumstances and to recover to a steady state after a failure. Hence, making use of this concept in groundwater systems is of cruciality in sustainable groundwater resources management. The main objective of the current research is to provide an overview on the employed procedures and existing difficulties appertaining to the appraisal of groundwater resilience. To this end, 36 studies which have evaluated groundwater resilience were regarded. Results highlighted that not only a very limited literature has employed groundwater resilience, but there also exist multiple knowledge gaps and complications, including resilience dimension, data scarcity and inaccuracies. In terms of groundwater quality and saltwater intrusion much little research exist, i.e. 7 studies among 36 ones. Evaluating groundwater resilience quantitatively, 11 methods were distinguished, each of which with its own advantages and disadvantages which may be engaged depending on factors such as available data and type of aquifer. Finally, more groundwater resilience analyses must be conducted at different spatiotemporal scales in order to preserve aquifers for the future generations. In summary, followings may be regarded to evaluate groundwater resilience:•To begin with, it must be specified which aspect of the aquifer's resilience and toward which unsatisfactory condition is planned to be considered.•Provided that no groundwater modeling is intended to be conducted, the observation data may be analyzed, considering the current state, governing violations, and new steady state.•On condition that groundwater simulation is planned to be conducted, subsequent to model's calibration and verification, the response of the aquifer, as a resilience criterion, is determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.