ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022
Challenges and enablers for implementation of WHO 'Best buys' interventions targeting risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa: a mixed methods study.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A co-creation approach to selecting and adapting adolescent tobacco and air-pollution interventions and strategies for implementation in diverse countries: insights from FRESHAIR4Life.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the implementation of 'Best buys', cost-effective interventions that address risk factors of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, country responses to the implementation of these have been slow and undocumented. The aim of this study was to identify and understand challenges and enablers for the implementation of WHO 'Best buys' for risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa (SA). Methods: a mixed methods research with a sequential dominant status design was used starting with a document review to take stock of WHO 'Best buys' in policy in SA. A qualitative study using key informant interviews was then done to identify and understand challenges and enablers for implementation. A triangulation approach for the analysis of both document review and qualitative data was used. Results: SA has made good progress in including the WHO 'Best buys' in the policy. However, several challenges hamper the successful implementation. Most challenges were related to upstream policy implementation processes such as competing interests of actors, lack of balance between economic vs health gains, and lack of funding. Enabling factors included multi-sectoral engagement and collaboration; community ownership and empowerment; building partnerships for co-creation of enabling environments; leveraging on the existing infrastructure of other health programs; contextualization of policies and programs; and political will and leadership. Conclusion: SA has made good progress in including WHO 'Best buys' targeting risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in policy, however, various contextual barriers influence effective implementation. Hence, there is a need to leverage enabling factors to foster the implementation of WHO 'Best buys' interventions targeting risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.