ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2023
Ideal Length and Diameter for Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Biomechanical Analysis of Intramedullary Threaded Nail Fixation and Dorsal Plate and Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Base Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2027Article
- Intramedullary Headless Screw Feasibility for Anatomical Reduction in II-V Metacarpal Fractures: A CT-Based Morphometric Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intramedullary Threaded Nail Versus Dorsal Plate and Screw Fixation of Comminuted Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparisons of F.E.R.I. techniques with different type of intramedullary screws fixation for Jones fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This biomechanical study evaluated the effect of intramedullary screw diameter and length relative to 3-point bending force and torsional force when used to stabilize metacarpal shaft fractures. Methods: Transverse osteotomies were made in the proximal metacarpal shaft in 36 middle finger metacarpal fourth-generation composite Sawbones. To compare screw diameters, antegrade intramedullary screws of 30-mm length were placed in 6 metacarpals, which included 4.7-mm Acutrak 2, Standard Acutrak 2 (4.0 mm), and Mini-Acutrak 2 (3.5 mm) screws. To compare screw lengths, metacarpals were fixated with Standard Acutrak 2 screws of 26, 30, or 34 mm in length, with screw tips bypassing the osteotomy by 6, 10, or 14 mm, respectively. A 6 degrees of freedom robot was used for torsional and 3-point bending testing. Results: Increasing screw diameter demonstrated significant differences in both 3-point bending and torsional strengths. Maximum torsional loads were 69 Ncm (4.7-mm Acutrak 2), 45 Ncm (Standard Acutrak 2), and 27 Ncm (Mini-Acutrak 2) ( Conclusions: The results demonstrated significantly higher torsional strength and resistance to 3-point bending with larger intramedullary screw diameters. Further, when selecting the intramedullary screw length, the screw tip should pass at least 10 mm beyond the fracture. Clinical Relevance: This study provided biomechanical evidence to guide surgeons in selecting intramedullary screw diameter and length for treating metacarpal fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.