Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36974283›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2023

Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline on Dupuytren Disease.

Marius A Kemler, Robert S de Wijn, Annet L van Rijssen, Yara E van Kooij, Monique P M Ottenhof, Mark van Heijl, Roel J H M Steenbakkers, Joost B J Geise

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marius A KemlerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robert S de WijnDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk and Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem/Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Annet L van RijssenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Yara E van KooijXpert Handtherapie, Xpert Clinics, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Monique P M OttenhofHand and Wrist Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark van HeijlDepartment of Surgery, Hand and Wrist unit, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, The Netherlands.
Roel J H M SteenbakkersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost B J GeiseDutch patient association for Dupuytren's disease, Dronten, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLErasmus MC · NLIsala · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a comprehensive, evidence-based overview of the treatment for Dupuytren disease, specifically needle techniques, radiotherapy, primary conservative therapy, surgery, lipofilling, operative arthrolysis, salvage techniques, and the postoperative protocol and to make clinical recommendations for health care practitioners and patients. Methods: Comprehensive multidisciplinary guideline process funded by the Quality Foundation of the Dutch Federation of Medical Specialists. This process included a development, commentary, and authorization phase. Patients participated in every phase. Multiple databases and existing guidelines up to August 2020 were searched. Studies on Dupuytren disease were considered eligible. Specific eligibility criteria were described per module. To appraise the certainty of the evidence, reviewers extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method, where applicable. Important considerations were as follows: patient values and preferences, costs, acceptability of other stakeholders, and feasibility of implementation. Recommendations were made based on the evidence from the literature and the considerations. The primary and secondary outcome measures were defined per module based on the input of patients obtained in collaboration with the Netherlands Patient Federation and health care providers from different professions. Results: The following 8 specific modules were completed for Dupuytren disease: (1) needle techniques, (2) radiotherapy, (3) primary conservative therapy, (4) surgery, (5) lipofilling, (6) operative arthrolysis, (7) salvage techniques, and (8) the postoperative protocol. Conclusions: Our Dutch multidisciplinary guideline on Dupuytren disease provides 8 modules developed according to the standards of the Dutch Federation of Medical Specialists. Evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice are provided for needle techniques, radiotherapy, primary conservative therapy, surgery, lipofilling, operative arthrolysis, salvage techniques, and the postoperative protocol. This guideline can assist health care providers and patients in clinical practice. Type of study/level of evidence: Systematic review/I-II.

Indexed as

Dupuytren diseaseGuideline

Identifiers

PMID36974283
PMCPMC10039301
OpenAlexW4312118259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.