Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36974268›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2023

Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.

Keni C S Lee, Boris Breznen, Anastasia Ukhova, Friedrich Koehler, Seth S Martin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frailty and heart failure: State-of-the-art review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Keni C S LeeSanofi, General Medicines Global Business Unit, Paris 75008, France.
Boris BreznenEvidinno Outcomes Research Inc., Vancouver, BC V5Y1K2, Canada.
Anastasia UkhovaSanofi, General Medicines Global Business Unit, Moscow 125009, Russia.
Friedrich KoehlerDivision for Cardiovascular Telemedicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-4123
Seth S MartinCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohns Hopkins University · USSanofi (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphical AbstractAdherence to cardiac rehabilitation following a primary event has been demonstrated to improve quality of life, increase functional capacity, and decrease hospitalizations and mortality. Mobile technologies offer an opportunity to improve both the quality and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation, and recent clinical studies investigated this technology. This literature review summarizes the current use of mobile health, wearable activity monitors (WAMs), and other multi-component technologies deployed to support home-based virtual cardiac rehabilitation. The methodology was adapted from the

Indexed as

Cardiac rehabilitationeHealthpatient empowermentSelf-careTelemedicineVirtual healthcare

Identifiers

PMID36974268
PMCPMC10039430
OpenAlexW4319723589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.